ASM Chapter 2 | All Figures | v0.3 | Use browser Print (Ctrl+P / Cmd+P) to export individual figures
Figure 2.6
Wt vs. Ct: Two Kinds of Writing
An agent operation writes data to an external location
Decision criterion
Would the value of this operation be destroyed
if no one read the output?
YES
Value is in the mutation,
not the interpretation
Wt
Write Tool
Examples
Database insert
File write
API call with side effects
Write to unread shared doc
Record creation
Governed by standard bonding rules. No A3 force channel required.
NO
Value requires a receiving
interpreter to exist
Ct
Communication Tool
Examples
Slack message
Email
Chat response
Write to doc as communication protocol
Human-facing report
Falls under the A3 force law. Human closure protocol applies.
Structural note: Both Wt and Ct may write bytes to an external system. The distinction is not the technical mechanism. It is the structural intent. Targeting storage is Wt. Addressing an interpreter is Ct. Ct interactions fall under the A3 human closure force law in ways that Wt interactions do not, making correct classification load-bearing in molecular notation.
A decision schematic for classifying write operations. The branching criterion is intent: does the write target a storage system (Wt) or an interpreter who will receive and act on the information (Ct)? The technical mechanism may be identical: both may write bytes to an external system. The structural classification differs, and the difference determines which force laws govern the interaction in a molecular formula.